What was the result of Senate roll call vote 138 in the 111th Congress?

The Senate vote on May 11, 2010 ended "Amendment Rejected (37-62)", 37-62. The vote was on: On the Amendment S.Amdt. 3760 to S.Amdt. 3739 to S. 3217 (Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010) (S. 3217).

How many senators voted yes and no on Senate vote 138?

37 senators voted Yea and 62 voted Nay. 1 senator did not vote.

Which party supported Senate vote 138 in the 111th Congress?

Democrats voted 6-50 and Republicans voted 30-11. 18 senators crossed party lines.

Roll Call Vote #138 · 111th Congress · Session 2 · May 11, 2010, 12:05 PM (ET)

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 3760 to S.Amdt. 3739 to S. 3217 (Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010) (S. 3217)

Amendment S.Amdt. 3760 (To address availability of information concerning the meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee, and for other purposes.)

Amendment Rejected (37-62)

37 Yea

62 Nay

← Vote #137 Vote #139 →

How the Parties Voted

Democrat 57 senators

6 Yea / 50 Nay

1 not voting or present

Majority position: Nay

Republican 41 senators

30 Yea / 11 Nay

Majority position: Yea

Independent 2 senators

1 Yea / 1 Nay

Majority position: Yea

Crossed Party Lines

Lamar Alexander (Republican–TN) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Bob Bennett (Republican–UT) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Kit Bond (Republican–MO) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Scott Brown (Republican–MA) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Maria Cantwell (Democrat–WA) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Bob Corker (Republican–TN) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Byron Dorgan (Democrat–ND) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Russell Feingold (Democrat–WI) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Judd Gregg (Republican–NH) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Mike Johanns (Republican–NE) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Jon Kyl (Republican–AZ) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Blanche Lincoln (Democrat–AR) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Richard Lugar (Republican–IN) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Mitch McConnell (Republican–KY) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Bernie Sanders (Independent–VT) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
George Voinovich (Republican–OH) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Jim Webb (Democrat–VA) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Ron Wyden (Democrat–OR) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay

Full Roll Call: How Every Senator Voted

Yea 37

Nay 62

Not Voting 1

Robert Byrd (WV)

Other Votes on S. 3217

Vote #124 On the Cloture Motion S. 3217

Cloture Motion Rejected (57-41, 3/5 majority required) Apr 26, 2010
Vote #125 On the Motion (Motion to Instruct the Sergeant at Arms)

Motion Agreed to (50-31) Apr 26, 2010
Vote #126 On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed S. 3217

Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (57-41, 3/5 majority required) Apr 27, 2010
Vote #127 On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed S. 3217

Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (56-42, 3/5 majority required) Apr 28, 2010
Vote #130 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 3737 to S.Amdt. 3739 to S. 3217 (Restoring American Fi…

Amendment Agreed to (96-1) May 5, 2010
Vote #131 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 3827 to S.Amdt. 3739 to S. 3217 (Restoring American Fi…

Amendment Agreed to (93-5) May 5, 2010
Vote #132 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 3749 to S.Amdt. 3739 to S. 3217 (Restoring American Fi…

Amendment Agreed to (98-0) May 6, 2010
Vote #133 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 3826 to S.Amdt. 3739 to S. 3217 (Restoring American Fi…

Amendment Rejected (38-61) May 6, 2010
Vote #134 On the Motion (Motion to Instruct the Sgt. At Arms)

Motion Agreed to (61-33) May 6, 2010
Vote #135 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 3898 to S.Amdt. 3733 to S.Amdt. 3739 to S. 3217

Amendment Rejected (35-59) May 6, 2010

All Senate votes on S. 3217 →

Source: Official U.S. Senate roll call vote data (senate.gov ↗).

Browse all Senate roll call votes → Senate voting analysis →