What was the result of Senate roll call vote 229 in the 110th Congress?

The Senate vote on Jun 27, 2007 ended "Motion to Table Agreed to (53-45)", 53-45. The vote was on: On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 1934 to S. 1639 (No short title on file).

How many senators voted yes and no on Senate vote 229?

53 senators voted Yea and 45 voted Nay. 2 senators did not vote.

Which party supported Senate vote 229 in the 110th Congress?

Republicans voted 6-32 and Democrats voted 33-4. 10 senators crossed party lines.

Roll Call Vote #229 · 110th Congress · Session 1 · Jun 27, 2007, 12:03 PM (ET)

On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 1934 to S. 1639 (No short title on file)

Amendment S.Amdt. 1934 (Of a perfecting nature.)

Motion to Table Agreed to (53-45)

53 Yea

45 Nay

← Vote #228 Vote #230 →

How the Parties Voted

Republican 39 senators

6 Yea / 32 Nay

1 not voting or present

Majority position: Nay

Democrat 38 senators

33 Yea / 4 Nay

1 not voting or present

Majority position: Yea

Independent Democrat 1 senator

1 Yea / 0 Nay

Majority position: Yea

Crossed Party Lines

Max Baucus (Democrat–MT) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Larry Craig (Republican–ID) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Byron Dorgan (Democrat–ND) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Chuck Hagel (Republican–NE) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Jon Kyl (Republican–AZ) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Richard Lugar (Republican–IN) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Mel Martinez (Republican–FL) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Claire McCaskill (Democrat–MO) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Jay Rockefeller, IV (Democrat–WV) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
John Warner (Republican–VA) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay