What was the result of Senate roll call vote 349 in the 108th Congress?

The Senate vote on Sep 16, 2003 ended "Motion Agreed to (53-41, 3/5 majority required)", 53-41. The vote was on: On the Motion (Motion To Table Feinstein Amdt. No. 1655).

How many senators voted yes and no on Senate vote 349?

53 senators voted Yea and 41 voted Nay. 6 senators did not vote.

Which party supported Senate vote 349 in the 108th Congress?

Republicans voted 48-1 and Democrats voted 5-39. 6 senators crossed party lines.

Roll Call Vote #349 · 108th Congress · Session 1 · Sep 16, 2003, 3:19 PM (ET)

On the Motion (Motion To Table Feinstein Amdt. No. 1655)

Amendment S.Amdt. 1655 (To prohibit the use of funds for Department of Energy activities relating to the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator, Advanced Weapons Concepts, modification of the readiness posture of the Nevada Test Site, and the Modern Pit Facility, and to make the amount of funds made available by the prohibition for debt reduction.)

Motion Agreed to (53-41, 3/5 majority required)

53 Yea

41 Nay

← Vote #348 Vote #350 →

How the Parties Voted

Republican 51 senators

48 Yea / 1 Nay

2 not voting or present

Majority position: Yea

Democrat 48 senators

5 Yea / 39 Nay

4 not voting or present

Majority position: Nay

Independent 1 senator

0 Yea / 1 Nay

Majority position: Nay

Crossed Party Lines

Evan Bayh (Democrat–IN) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Lincoln Chafee (Republican–RI) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Fritz Hollings (Democrat–SC) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Zell Miller (Democrat–GA) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Bill Nelson (Democrat–FL) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Ben Nelson (Democrat–NE) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay

On the Motion (Motion To Table Feinstein Amdt. No. 1655)

How the Parties Voted

Crossed Party Lines

Full Roll Call: How Every Senator Voted

Yea 53

Nay 41

Not Voting 6