What was the result of Senate roll call vote 163 in the 106th Congress?

The Senate vote on Jun 29, 2000 ended "Amendment Agreed to (54-43)", 54-43. The vote was on: On the Amendment S.Amdt. 3689 to H.R. 4577 (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001).

How many senators voted yes and no on Senate vote 163?

54 senators voted Yea and 43 voted Nay. 3 senators did not vote.

Which party supported Senate vote 163 in the 106th Congress?

Republicans voted 47-1 and Democrats voted 2-36. 4 senators crossed party lines.

Roll Call Vote #163 · 106th Congress · Session 2 · Jun 29, 2000, 3:04 PM (ET)

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 3689 to H.R. 4577 (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001)

Amendment S.Amdt. 3689 (To protect the Social Security and Medicare surpluses through strengthened budgetary enforcement mechanisms.)

Amendment Agreed to (54-43)

54 Yea

43 Nay

← Vote #162 Vote #164 →

How the Parties Voted

Republican 49 senators

47 Yea / 1 Nay

1 not voting or present

Majority position: Yea

Democrat 40 senators

2 Yea / 36 Nay

2 not voting or present

Majority position: Nay

Independent 1 senator

1 Yea / 0 Nay

Majority position: Yea

Independent Democrat 1 senator

0 Yea / 1 Nay

Majority position: Nay

Crossed Party Lines

Russell Feingold (Democrat–WI) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
James Jeffords (Independent–VT) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Arlen Specter (Democrat–PA) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Ted Stevens (Republican–AK) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 3689 to H.R. 4577 (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001)

How the Parties Voted

Crossed Party Lines

Full Roll Call: How Every Senator Voted

Yea 54

Nay 43

Not Voting 3