What was the result of Senate roll call vote 59 in the 105th Congress?

The Senate vote on May 7, 1997 ended "Motion to Table Agreed to (51-49)", 51-49. The vote was on: On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 64 to S. 672 (No short title on file).

How many senators voted yes and no on Senate vote 59?

51 senators voted Yea and 49 voted Nay.

Which party supported Senate vote 59 in the 105th Congress?

Republicans voted 45-5 and Democrats voted 4-37. 9 senators crossed party lines.

Roll Call Vote #59 · 105th Congress · Session 1 · May 7, 1997, 2:46 PM (ET)

On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 64 to S. 672 (No short title on file)

Amendment S.Amdt. 64 (To strike section 310.)

Motion to Table Agreed to (51-49)

51 Yea

49 Nay

← Vote #58 Vote #60 →

How the Parties Voted

Republican 50 senators

45 Yea / 5 Nay

Majority position: Yea

Democrat 41 senators

4 Yea / 37 Nay

Majority position: Nay

Independent 1 senator

0 Yea / 1 Nay

Majority position: Nay

Independent Democrat 1 senator

0 Yea / 1 Nay

Majority position: Nay

Crossed Party Lines

John Chafee (Republican–RI) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Kent Conrad (Democrat–ND) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Byron Dorgan (Democrat–ND) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
William Frist (Republican–TN) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Timothy Hutchinson (Republican–AR) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Daniel Inouye (Democrat–HI) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
William Roth, Jr. (Republican–DE) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Olympia Snowe (Republican–ME) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Arlen Specter (Democrat–PA) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay

On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 64 to S. 672 (No short title on file)

How the Parties Voted

Crossed Party Lines

Full Roll Call: How Every Senator Voted

Yea 51

Nay 49