What was the result of Senate roll call vote 169 in the 103rd Congress?

The Senate vote on Jun 24, 1993 ended "Motion to Table Agreed to (51-46)", 51-46. The vote was on: On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 516 to S. 1134 (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993).

How many senators voted yes and no on Senate vote 169?

51 senators voted Yea and 46 voted Nay. 3 senators did not vote.

Which party supported Senate vote 169 in the 103rd Congress?

Democrats voted 48-4 and Republicans voted 2-39. 7 senators crossed party lines.

Roll Call Vote #169 · 103rd Congress · Session 1 · Jun 24, 1993, 1:23 PM (ET)

On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 516 to S. 1134 (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993)

Amendment S.Amdt. 516 (To eliminate the increase in the taxation of social security benefits.)

Motion to Table Agreed to (51-46)

51 Yea

46 Nay

← Vote #168 Vote #170 →

How the Parties Voted

Democrat 53 senators

48 Yea / 4 Nay

1 not voting or present

Majority position: Yea

Republican 42 senators

2 Yea / 39 Nay

1 not voting or present

Majority position: Nay

Independent 1 senator

0 Yea / 1 Nay

Majority position: Nay

Independent Democrat 1 senator

1 Yea / 0 Nay

Majority position: Yea

Crossed Party Lines

Jeff Bingaman, Jr. (Democrat–NM) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Richard Bryan (Democrat–NV) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Ben Campbell (Republican–CO) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
John Danforth (Republican–MO) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Dennis DeConcini (Democrat–AZ) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Howell Heflin (Democrat–AL) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
James Jeffords (Independent–VT) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea

On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 516 to S. 1134 (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993)

How the Parties Voted

Crossed Party Lines

Full Roll Call: How Every Senator Voted

Yea 51

Nay 46

Not Voting 3