How many senators voted yes and no on Senate vote 140?

47 senators voted Yea and 45 voted Nay. 8 senators did not vote.

Which party supported Senate vote 140 in the 103rd Congress?

Democrats voted 45-5 and Republicans voted 0-37. 6 senators crossed party lines.

Roll Call Vote #140 · 103rd Congress · Session 1 · Jun 9, 1993, 2:06 PM (ET)

On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 397 to S.Amdt. 366 to S. 3 (House of Representatives Campaign Spending Limit and Election Reform Act of 1993)

Q: What was the result of Senate roll call vote 140 in the 103rd Congress?

The Senate vote on Jun 9, 1993 ended "Motion to Table Agreed to (47-45)", 47-45. The vote was on: On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 397 to S.Amdt. 366 to S. 3 (House of Representatives Campaign Spending Limit and Election Reform Act of 1993).

Amendment S.Amdt. 397 (To require disclosure of communications paid with taxpayer funds.)

Motion to Table Agreed to (47-45)

47 Yea

45 Nay

← Vote #139 Vote #141 →

How the Parties Voted

Democrat 54 senators

45 Yea / 5 Nay

4 not voting or present

Majority position: Yea

Republican 41 senators

0 Yea / 37 Nay

4 not voting or present

Majority position: Nay

Independent 1 senator

0 Yea / 1 Nay

Majority position: Nay

Independent Democrat 1 senator

1 Yea / 0 Nay

Majority position: Yea

Crossed Party Lines

Tom Harkin (Democrat–IA) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Howell Heflin (Democrat–AL) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
James Jeffords (Independent–VT) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Herbert Kohl (Democrat–WI) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Frank Lautenberg (Democrat–NJ) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea
Arlen Specter (Democrat–PA) voted Nay while most of their caucus voted Yea

On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 397 to S.Amdt. 366 to S. 3 (House of Representatives Campaign Spending Limit and Election Reform Act of 1993)

How the Parties Voted

Crossed Party Lines

Full Roll Call: How Every Senator Voted

Yea 47

Nay 45

Not Voting 8