What was the result of Senate roll call vote 162 in the 101st Congress?

The Senate vote on Aug 3, 1989 ended "Motion to Table Failed (8-92)", 8-92. The vote was on: On the Motion to Table S. 1153 (S. 1153).

How many senators voted yes and no on Senate vote 162?

8 senators voted Yea and 92 voted Nay.

Which party supported Senate vote 162 in the 101st Congress?

Democrats voted 1-54 and Republicans voted 7-38. 8 senators crossed party lines.

Roll Call Vote #162 · 101st Congress · Session 1 · Aug 3, 1989, 11:00 AM (ET)

On the Motion to Table S. 1153 (S. 1153)

A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the establishment of presumptions of service-connection between certain diseases experienced by veterans who served in Vietnam era and exposure to certain toxic herbicide agents used in Vietnam; to provide for interim benefits for veterans of such service who have certain diseases; to improve the reporting requirements relating to the "R…

Show full description

…anch Hand Study"; and for other purposes.

Motion to Table Failed (8-92)

8 Yea

92 Nay

← Vote #161 Vote #163 →

How the Parties Voted

Democrat 55 senators

1 Yea / 54 Nay

Majority position: Nay

Republican 45 senators

7 Yea / 38 Nay

Majority position: Nay

Crossed Party Lines

Kit Bond (Republican–MO) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Robert Dole (Republican–KS) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Fritz Hollings (Democrat–SC) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Gordon Humphrey (Republican–NH) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Richard Lugar (Republican–IN) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Frank Murkowski (Republican–AK) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Alan Simpson (Republican–WY) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay
Malcolm Wallop (Republican–WY) voted Yea while most of their caucus voted Nay

On the Motion to Table S. 1153 (S. 1153)

How the Parties Voted

Crossed Party Lines

Full Roll Call: How Every Senator Voted

Yea 8

Nay 92